A Correlative Study Between Size of Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Pure Tone Audiometry and Intraoperative Findings in Tympanoplasty

Main Article Content

Santosh U P
Sridurga J
Aravind D R

Abstract

Introduction


            Chronic otitis media (COM) is a most common and prevalent disease of the middle ear. COM has been defined as a longstanding inflammatory condition of middle ear and mastoid, associated with perforation of the tympanic membrane. Tympanoplasties are common surgeries performed for chronic otitis media in inactive mucosal type. Any otological surgery may involve a menace/ hazard of hearing loss post operatively.


            In this study, an attempt was made to correlate, size of tympanic membrane perforation, pure tone audiometry and intra-operative findings in tympanoplasties, results were analysed and conclusion drawn.


Materials and Methods


Forty patients attending ENT OPD with chronic otitis media (COM), inactive mucosal type, with conductive hearing loss undergoing tympanoplasties who were willing to participate in the study were selected.


 Ear was examined pre-operatively to assess the size of perforation and then, pure tone audiometry (PTA) was done to assess the type of hearing loss and its severity. During tympanoplasty, middle ear was inspected for ossicular status and any other pathology was noted. Later, the size of tympanic membrane perforation, pure tone audiometry and intra operative findings were correlated with each other and analysed.


Result 


In small and medium sized perforation, PTA and intraoperative findings correlated with each other. Whereas, in large and subtotal perforation, there was no correlation.


Conclusion


            In small and medium sized perforation, middle ear inspection may not be necessary. Whereas, in large and subtotal perforation it is necessary. 

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
U P S, J S, D R A. A Correlative Study Between Size of Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Pure Tone Audiometry and Intraoperative Findings in Tympanoplasty. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2020Jul.27 [cited 2024May17];26(1):43-7. Available from: https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/155
Section
Main article

References

Kumar N, Chilke D, Puttewar M.P. Clinical profile of tubotympanic CSOM and its management with special reference to site and size of tympanic membrane perforation, Eustachian tube function and three flap tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 64(1): 5-12

Lerut B, Pfammatter A, Moons J, Linder T. Functional correlation of tympanic membrane perforation size. Otol Neurotol. 2012; 33(3):379-86

Kaur K, Chadha S, Kumar D and Preethi. Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 63(3): 208-13

Bewitch J, Prinsley P. Hearing loss following myringoplasty – implications of informed consent. The Journal of Laryngol & Otol. 2015; 129:342-7

Dhingra PL. Dhingra S. Disease of ear, nose and throat. 5th edn. New Delhi. Elsevier.2010. Chapter 5. pp 34

Nepal A, Bhandary S, Mishra SC, Singh I, Kumar P. The morphology of central tympanic membrane perforations. Nepal Med Coll J. 2008;9:239‑44

Nepal A, Bhandary S, Mishra SC, Singh I, Kumar P. The morphology of central tympanic membrane perforations. Nepal Med Coll J. 2008;9:239‑44

Singh R, Srivastava A, Mohan C. Comparative evaluation of hearing in different tympanic membraneperforations. Indian J Otol. 2016;22:258-61

Ribeiro FA, Gaudino VR, Pinheiro CD, Marc¸al GJ, Mitre EI. Objective comparison between perforation andhearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:386-9.