Endoscopic Repair of Spontaneous CSF Rhinorrhoea: Results from 21 Cases

Main Article Content

Swapan Kumar Ghosh
Indranath Kundu
Mukesh Kumar Singh
Rajarshi Chakraborty
Suyash Banerjee

Abstract

Introduction


Surgery to close the skull base defect is the treatment of choice in persistent spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea with endoscopic endonasal repair being the method of choice.  This study analysed the demographics of presentation, optimal diagnostic and localisation strategies and the effectiveness of transnasal endoscopic treatment strategies  with post-operative follow-up of CSF rhinorrhoea patients in a tertiary care institution   .



Materials and Methods


 A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 21 CSF rhinorrhoea patients operated on between August 2014 and August 2018 and results documented.



Results


CSF rhinorrhoea was found most commonly in middle aged female patients in our study. HRCT PNS was capable of identifying a leak site in 66% of the cases. All patients were operated endoscopically with no major intra-operative or post-operative complications. Resolution of CSF leak occurred in 85% of cases.



Conclusion


CSF rhinorrhoea can be diagnosed and endoscopic repair can be effectively performed in our existing tertiary care set-ups with good results.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Ghosh SK, Kundu I, Singh MK, Chakraborty R, Banerjee S. Endoscopic Repair of Spontaneous CSF Rhinorrhoea: Results from 21 Cases. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2020Apr.30 [cited 2024Dec.28];28(1):71-5. Available from: https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/180
Section
Our experience
Author Biographies

Swapan Kumar Ghosh, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata 700004

Assistant Professor, Dept. of ENT

Indranath Kundu, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata 700004

Professor

Dept of ENT

Mukesh Kumar Singh, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata 700004

RMO

Dept of ENT

Rajarshi Chakraborty, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata 700004

Senior Resident, Dept. of ENT

Suyash Banerjee, R G Kar Medical College and Hospital Kolkata 700004

Senior Resident

Dept of ENT

References

Han CY, Backous DD. Basic principles of cerebrospinal fluid metabolism and intracranial pressure homeostasis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005; 38:569-76

Rodney J, Wilensky, Maloney E, Grady MS, Bolger, William E. Elevated intracranial pressures in spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Am J Rhinol. 2003; 17:191-5

Har-El G. What is “spontaneous” cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea? Classification of cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999; 108:323-6

Wigand ME. Transnasal ethmoidectomy under endoscopical control. Rhinology 1981; 19:7-15

Lobo BC, Baumanis MM, Nelson RF. Surgical repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks: A systematic review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2017; 2(5):215-24

Vemuri NV, Karanam LS, Manchikanti V, Dandamudi S, Puvvada SK, Vemuri VK. Imaging review of cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2017; 27: 441

Pool CD, Patel VA, Schilling A, Hollenbeak C, Goyal N. Economic implications of localization strategies for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2019 Dec 12.

Stone JA, Castillo M, Neelon B, Mukherji SK. Evaluation of CSF leaks: high-resolution CT compared with contrast-enhanced CT and radionuclide cisternography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999; 20:706-12

Lee TJ, Huang CC, Chuang CC, Huang SF. Transnasal endoscopic repair

of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and skull base defect: ten-year experience. Laryngoscope 2004; 114:1475-81

Kirtane MV, Gautham K, Upadhyaya SR. Endoscopic CSF rhinorrhoea closure: Our experience in 267 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132:208-12

Banks CA, Palmer JN, Chiu AG, O’ Malley BW Jr, Woodworth BA. Endoscopic closure of CSF rhinorrhoea: 193 cases over 21 years. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:826-33

Hegazy HM, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Zweig J. Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: A meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1166-72.

Most read articles by the same author(s)