Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction
In a series of day care office procedures, techniques like fat plug myringoplasty and Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) cauterization are becoming increasingly popular for managing small central perforations now-a-days[Office1] . These are minor, cost effective procedures and have success rates that match success rates of conventional tympanoplasty[Office2] . The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial, was to compare the effectiveness of fat plug myringoplasty and chemical cauterization in the management of small centrally located perforations of the pars tensa.
Materials and Methods
The study was carried out over a period of 2 years on 62 patients selected from ENT OPD in our tertiary health care setup of central India. All the selected patients were grouped into two using a random allocation software EPi Info7.1.1.14. Group A included those who underwent fat plug myringoplasty while group B were those who underwent TCA cauterization.
Results
At 6 months follow up there was closure of perforation in 29 out of 30(96.6%) patients of group A and 29 out of 32(91%) patients of group B. In both groups success was defined by closure of perforation. Comparison of results was done using Fisher Exact Test. The difference between the success rates of the two procedures was statistically insignificant with p value of 0.6624, indicating that both the office procedures are equally effective and can be used according to the needs of the patients.
Conclusion
These office procedures can revolutionize the protocol of tympanoplasty which has an obvious higher morbidity and more days of absenteeism as compared to these minor procedures.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Mukherjee M, Paul R. Minimyringoplasty; Repair of small central Perforation of tympanic membrane by Fat Graft: A Prospective study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 65(4): 302-4
Ringenberg JC. Fat graft tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1962; 72: 188-92
Kim DK, Park SN, Yeo SW, et al. Clinical efficacy of fat graft myringoplasty for perforations of different sizes and locations. Acta Otolarygol. 2011; 131(1): 22-6
Hagemann M, Hausler R. Tympanoplasty with adipose tissue. Laryngorhinootologie 2003; 82(6): 393-6
Chalishagar U. Fat plug myringoplasty.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 57:43-4
Deddens AE, Muntz HR, Lusk RP. Adipose myringoplasty in children. Laryngoscope 1993; 103: 216-9
Neuhoff H. The transplantation of tissues, New York; Appleton & Co. 1923; 74
Peer LA. Loss of weight and volume in human fat grafts with postulations of a “cell survival theory.” Plast Reconstr Surg. 1950; 5: 217-30
Ozgursoy OB, Yorulmaz I. Fat graft myringoplasty: A cost effective but underused procedure. J Laryngol Otol. 2005; 119:277-9
Wilde WR, Hewson A. Practical observations on aural surgery and the nature and treatment of diseases of the ear. Blanchard & Lea, Philadelphia 1853; 292-3
Derlacki EL. Office closure of central tympanic membrane perforation: A quarter century experience. Transactions of the American Academy of Ophthalmology 1973; 77: 53-6
Shambaugh GE. Glasscock & Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear. 2nd ed. W.B. Saunders company, Philadelphia 1967; 429-37
Goldman NC. Chemical closure of chronic tympanic membrane perforations. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2007; 7(10):850-1.