An Open-Label Observational Trial to Evaluate the Possible Effects of Individualized Homoeopathic Medicines in Symptomatic Nasal Polyp
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Nasal polyps presenting with chronic rhino-sinusitis (CRS) is a commonly encountered condition characterized by nasal obstruction, loss of sense of smell (anosmia), postnasal drip, headache, and sleep disorders. Possibly 60-65% of the populations suffering from CRS has predisposition to nasal polyps. Homoeopathic literature claims to offer successful treatment of nasal polyps; but scarcely subjected to systematic research.
Materials and Methods: A prospective, open, non-randomized, single arm, observational trial of pre-post comparison design was conducted on 44 patients suffering from symptomatic nasal polyps. Sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-20) and European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires were taken as the primary and secondary outcome measures respectively; assessed at baseline and after 3 months. Individualized homoeopathic medicines were prescribed on ‘totality of symptoms’. Intention to treat sample was subjected to statistical analysis. Data distribution was examined. Non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank test and post hoc parametric paired t test were used accordingly. P values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
Results: Forty four patients were enrolled; 4 dropped out. Skiagrams revealed complete regressions of polyps in 23 (58%) cases. Statistically significant improvements were observed in both the subjective patient-rated outcomes – mean reduction of SNOT-20 scores by 19.9 [sd 15.5; 95% CI 15.5 to 24.2; P < 0.001], EQ-5D-5L questionnaire score by 0.9 [sd 2.6; 95% CI 0.1 to 1.7; P = 0.029]; and EQ-5D-5L VAS by 14.4 [sd 4.7; 95% CI 12.9 to 15.9; P < 0.001].
Conclusion: Homoeopathic medicines showed promising treatment effect in symptomatic nasal polyps. Randomized trials are warranted.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Murphy MP, Fishman P, Short SO, Sullivan SD, Yueh B, Weymuller EA Jr. Health care utilization and cost among adults with chronic rhinosinusitis enrolled in a health maintenance organization. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 127:367-76
Anand VK: Epidemiology and economic impact of rhinosinusitis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2004; 193:3-5
Jackson LL, Kountakis SE. Classification and management of rhinosinusitis and its complications. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005; 38:1143-53
Smith TL, Batra PS, Seiden AM, Hannley M. Evidence supporting endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of adult chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol. 2005; 19:537-43
Gliklich RE, Metson R. The health impact of chronic sinusitis in patients seeking otolaryngologic care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995; 113:104-9
Piccirillo JF. Outcomes research and obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope 2000;110:16-20
National Commission on Sleep Disorders Research. Wake Up America: A National Sleep Alert. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1993
Pade J. Sinusitis. Eine ernst zu nehmende Erkrankung. HNO 2005; DOI 10.1007/s00106-005-1227-0
Pleis JR, Coles R. Summary health statistics for US adults: Nation Health Interview Survey, 1998. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2002; 10: 1-113
Becker DG. Sinusitis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2003; 13:175-94
Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Available from: http://www.gbe-bund.de/ Accessed on October 13, 2017
Ray NF, Baraniuk JN, Thamer M, et al. Healthcare expenditures for sinusitis in 1996: contributions of asthma, rhinitis, and other airway disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 103: 408-14
Metson R, Gliklich RE. Clinical outcome of endoscopic surgery for frontal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 124:1090-6
Goodale RL. Some causes of failure in frontal sinus surgery. Ann Otol. 1942; 51:648
Iro H, Mayr S, Wällisch C, Schick B, Wigand ME. Endoscopic sinus surgery: its subjective medium-term outcome in chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2004; 42:200-6
Sobol SE, Wright ED, Frenkiel S. One-year outcome analysis of functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis. J Otolaryngol. 1998; 27:252-7
Stammberger H, Posawetz G. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolarngol. 1990; 247:63-76
Hessler JL, Piccinllo JF, Fang D, et al. Clinical outcomes of chronic rhinosinusitis in response to medical therapy: Results of prospective study. Am J Rhinol. 2007; 21:10-8
Robinson S, Douglas R, and wormald PJ. The relationship between atopy and chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2006; 20:625-8
Piccinllo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20- Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test(SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 126:41-7
Browne JP, Hopkins C, Slack R, Cano SJ. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT): can we make it more clinically meaningful? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 136:736-41
The Euro-QOL group. EQ-5D-5L 2015. Available from: http://www.euroqol.org/eq- 5d-products/eq-5d-5l.html; last accessed July 18, 2015
The EuroQol Group. EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16 (3):199-208
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20 (10):1727-36
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMJ 2010; 340:c332
Dean ME, Coulter MK, Fisher P, Jobst K, Walach H. Reporting data on homoeopathic treatments (RedHot): a supplement to CONSORT. Homoeopathy 2007: 96(1):42-5
Mathie RT, Van Wassenhoven M, Jacobs J, Oberbaum M, Roniger H, Frye J, et al. Model validity of randomized placebo-controlled trials of individualized homoeopathic treatment. Homoeopathy 2017; 106 (4):194-202
Mathie RT, Van Wassenhoven M, Jacobs J, Oberbaum M, Frye J, Manchanda RK et al. Model validity and risk of bias in randomized placebo-controlled trials of individualized homoeopathic treatment. Complement Ther Med. 2016; 25:120-5
Saha S, Koley M, Ganguly S, Rath P, Roy Chowdhury P, Hossain SI. Developing the criteria for evaluating quality of individualization in homoeopathic clinical trial reporting a preliminary study. J Integr Med. 2014; 12(1):13-9.