Approaches to a Successful Myringoplasty – Which Factors Make a Myringoplasty Difficult?

Main Article Content

Wendy Smith
Swagatam Banerjee

Abstract

Abstract


Introduction


Myringoplasty has often been viewed as a “basic” ENT procedure. This paper will discuss the factors that can make a myringoplasty more challenging and suggest some techniques to overcome these.


Affecting Factors
Patient factors
The age of the patient, their habitus and co-existing co-morbidities are usually the factors affecting the choice and outcome of the procedure.


The ear
Anatomical variations, the nature of the pathology itself and the condition of the remnant tympanic membrane and the middle ear are important factors for consideration.


Other factors
Equipment availability, expertise of the surgical team and anaesthetic support can also influence the surgical procedure.


Surgical Procedure
The actual procedure can be done in a variety of ways including but not limited to different approaches, different techniques and using different equipment like microscopes, endoscopes, LASER, etc.

Results and Complications
The primary author reported a success rate of about 95% in her series. Complications of myringoplasty include myringitis, residual perforations, otitis externa and epithelial pearl formation.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Smith W, Banerjee S. Approaches to a Successful Myringoplasty – Which Factors Make a Myringoplasty Difficult?. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2021Jun.3 [cited 2024Dec.22];29(1):72-85. Available from: https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/462
Section
Main article
Author Biographies

Wendy Smith, Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Consultant

Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery

Swagatam Banerjee, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, United Kingdom

Specialty Doctor, Department of ENT and Head Neck Surgery

References

Rollin M, Rogers P, Robinson P. Natural history of paediatric tympanic membrane perforation. Otol Neurotol. 2011; 32(2):246-51

Phillips J, Yung M, Nunney, I. Myringoplasty outcomes in the UK. J Laryngol Otol. 2015; 129(9): 860-4. doi:10.1017/S002221511500198X

Vrabec JT, Deskin RW, Grady JJ. Meta-analysis of pediatric tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(5):530-4. doi:10.1001/archotol.125.5.530

Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for chronic tympanic membrane perforation in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015; 36:796-804

Raine C, Singh S. (1983). Tympanoplasty in children A review of 114 cases. J Laryngol Otol. 1983; 97(3):217-21. doi:10.1017/S0022215100094032

Grenner J. How I do it: meatoplasty of the ear canal. J Otolaryngol. 1996; 25(3):188-90

Rourke T, Snelling J, Aldren C. Cartilage graft butterfly myringoplasty: how we do it. Clinical Otolaryngology 2010; 35(2):135-8

Singh GB, Sidhu TS, Sharma A. Tympanoplasty type 1 in children: an evaluative study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 69:1071-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.02.016

Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP. Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002; 27(5):331-4. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002. 00590.x

Yung MW. Myringoplasty for subtotal perforation. Clin Otolaryngol. 1995; 20:241-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1995.tb01858.x

Mohammed Tawab H, Mahmoud Gharib F, Algarf, T M, ElSharkawy LS. Myringoplasty with and without Cortical Mastoidectomy in Treatment of Non-cholesteatomatous Chronic Otitis Media: A Comparative Study. Clinical medicine insights Ear Nose Throat 2014; 7:19-23. doi: 10.4137/CMENT.S17980

Yoon TH, Park S-K, Kim JY, Pae KH, Ahn JH. Tympanoplasty, with or without mastoidectomy, is highly effective for treatment of chronic otitis media in children, Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2007; 127:sup558, 44-8. DOI: 10.1080/03655230701624855

Nicholas BD, O'Reilly RC. Is cartilage preferable to fascia myringoplasty in children?. Laryngoscope 2010;120(11):2136-2137. doi:10.1002/lary.21006

Lee DY, Kim YH. Can Fat-plug Myringoplasty Be a Good Alternative to Formal Myringoplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(4):403-9. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001732

D’Eredità R. Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) myringoplasty in children: a randomized controlled study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 79(7):1085-9

James AL. Endoscope or microscope-guided pediatric tympanoplasty? Comparison of grafting technique and outcome. Laryngoscope 2017;127(11):2659-64

De Zinis LO, Berlucchi M, Nassif N. Double-handed endoscopic myringoplasty with a holding system in children: preliminary observations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017; 96:127-30

Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S, Gupta SC. Comparative study of the underlay and overlay techniques of myringoplasty in large and subtotal perforations of the tympanic membrane. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117(6):444-8. DOI: 10.1258/002221503321892262

Pfleiderer AG, Moffat DA. The fascia form graft: a technique for the repair of large perforations of the tympanic membrane. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988;13(6):427-34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb00316.x

Wormald PJ, van Renen G, Perks J, Jones JA, Langton-Hewer CD. The effect of the total intravenous anesthesia compared with inhalational anesthesia on the surgical field during endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol. 2005;19(5):514-20

COVID Surg Collaborative. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 29] [published correction appears in Lancet. 2020 Jun 9;:]. Lancet 2020; 396(10243):27-38. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X

Heikkinen T, Thint M, Chonmaitree T. Prevalence of various respiratory viruses in the middle ear during acute otitis media. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:260-4

Hellier W, Mitchell T, Thomas S. Mastoidectomy in the COVID era– the 2 microscope drape method to reduce aerosolization. Br Soc Otology. https://www.entuk.org/sites/default/files/Mastoidectomy%20in%20the%20COVID%20Era%20%E2%80%93%20The%202.pdf

Blevins NH, Karmody CS. Chronic myringitis: prevalence, presentation, and natural history. Otol Neurotol. 2001; 22(1):3-10. doi:10.1097/00129492-200101000-00002

Levi JR, Ames JA, Gitman L, et al. Clinical characteristics of pediatric granular myringitis. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 148 (2013), pp. 291-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599812470433

Kim YH. Clinical characteristics of granular myringitis treated with castellani solution

Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol.2011; 268:1139-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1500-7

Jung HH, Cho SD, Yoo CK, et al. Vinegar treatment in the management of granular myringitis. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2002; 116:176-80 PMID: 11893257

Van der Meer G. Granular myringitis: report of three prospective studies evaluating treatment options. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2010; 35:242-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02118.x

Jang C, Kim Y, Cho Y, Wang P. Endoscopy-aided laser therapy for intractable granular myringitis. J Laryngol Otol. 2006; 120(7):553-5. doi:10.1017/S0022215106000739

Prinsley P. Results of revision myringoplasty: Are they different to those of primary myringoplasty? J Laryngol Otol.2017; 131(4): 316-8. doi:10.1017/S0022215117000202.

Most read articles by the same author(s)