Use of Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale in Objective Evaluation of Symptomological Improvement in Post Septoplasty Patients

Main Article Content

Mukulika Saha
Shoham Banerjee
Rabi Hembrom
Indranil Sen

Abstract

Introduction


The complaint of nasal obstruction or difficulty in nasal breathing is highly subjective.
Benefits of Septoplasty, as perceived by the patient, also varies widely with subjective satisfaction ranging from complete alleviation of symptoms to a total failure.


Materials and Methods


Fifty three patients above 18 years of age, with anatomical deviation of the nasal septum as the sole cause of obstruction and symptoms persisting for more than 3 months, underwent septoplasty. Nasal endoscopy was done for Mladina typing of the nasal septal deviation. Pre and post operative NOSE (Nasal Obstruction & Symptom Evaluation) score were analysed.


Results


Mean preoperative NOSE score was 11.98 ±1.23. On the 6th and 12th postoperative week follow up NOSE score was 3.13±1.30 & 1.05±0.87 respectively with p value <0.05. 


Conclusion


Mladina typing along with NOSE score will help in letting the patient know about his or her expected outcome following septoplasty.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Saha M, Banerjee S, Hembrom R, Sen I. Use of Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale in Objective Evaluation of Symptomological Improvement in Post Septoplasty Patients. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2017Apr.30 [cited 2024Nov.23];25(1):12-8. Available from: https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/105
Section
Main article
Author Biographies

Mukulika Saha, Midnapur Medical College & Hospital, Paschim Medinipur

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Junior Resident

Shoham Banerjee, Midnapur Medical College & Hospital, Paschim Medinipur

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Senior Resident

Rabi Hembrom, Midnapur Medical College & Hospital, Paschim Medinipur

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Associate Professor

Indranil Sen, Midnapur Medical College & Hospital, Paschim Medinipur

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Professor & Head of Department

References

Mladina R. The role of the maxillary morphology in the development of pathological septal deformities. Rhinology 1987;25:199-205

Mladina R, Cujić E, Subarić M, Vuković K. Nasal septal deformities in ear, nose, and throat patients: an international study. American Journal of Otolaryngology 2008, 29(2):75-82

Tomkinson A. Eccles R. Acoustic rhinometry, Curr opin otolaryngol Head Neck surgery 1996; 4: 7-11

Clement PAR. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 1984: 22: 151-5

Eccles R. Measurement of the nasal airway. In Gleesson M Ed.Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology, Head Neck Surgery. 7th ed.London: Hodder Arnold; 2008,vol 2,pp1377-8

Stewart MG, Smith TL, Witsell DL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130:157-63

Beg MAA, Ahmed M. Evaluation of Septoplasty Outcome Using Nose (Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation) Scale. International Journal of Scientific Research 2014; 3(2):359-60

Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT, Johnson JT. Outcomes after Nasal Septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) Study. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2004;130(3):283-90

Kahveci OK, Miman MC, Yucel A, Yucedag F, Okur E, Altuntas A. The efficiency of Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale on patients with nasal septal deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2012 ; 39(3):275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2011.08.006

Singla K, Singh B, Bhagat S, Verma BS. Endoscopic Septoplasty: Prospective study in 50 cases of DNS. Clin Rhinol An Int J. 2013; 6(2):92-5.