A Novel Technique of Using Sponge as Post-Operative Nasal Packing
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction
In an effort to find a comparable but less expensive nasal pack with the qualities of MerocelR,this study was aimed at comparing the clinical efficacy and patient comfort level, while simultaneously using MerocelR and commercially available sponge as packing material in the same patient.
Materials and Methods
This study included those patients who underwent septoplasty, turbinoplasty or FESS and nasal packing was done randomly with MerocelR and commercially available sponge (polyurethane foam) on the same patient. Patients shared their experience on the symptom questionnaire on the first post-operative day and they underwent sequential diagnostic nasal endoscopy to assess the endoscopic status of the nasal cavity, which were documented meticulously.
Result
The post-operative bleeding control, pain during pack removal, general satisfaction, willingness to reuse and post-operative adhesion were same for both MerocelR and sponge.
Conclusion
The innovative technique of using a commonly available, commercially prepared sponge which is as good as MerocelR is well supported due to its efficacy in hemostasis, less mucosal trauma and less pain during pack removal. So it may be used in developing countries where cost is a factor for compliance of patients for undergoing surgeries without compromising on quality.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Dubin MR, Pletcher SD. Postoperative packing after septoplasty: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009; 42(2): 279-85
Rainer K. Weber. Nasal packing and stenting. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 8
Raghunathan S, Kameswaran M, Thomas JK. A prospective double blinded randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of a novel biodegradable synthectic polyurethane foam (Nasopore) vs Standard polyvinyl acetate sponge (Merocel) as packing material after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: The first Indian experience. Clin Rhinol: Int J. 2014; 7(3): 105-11
Breshman M, Mehigan B, Curran A. An evaluation of merocel and series of 5000 nasal packs in patients following nasal surgery: A prospective randomized trial. Clin Otolaryngol. 2007; 32: 352-5
Dutta S, Mukherjee A, Saha J, Biswas G, Haldar D, Sen I, Sinha R. Modified Technique of anterior nasal packing: A comparative study report. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 64 (4): 341-5
von Schoenberg M, Robinson P, Ryan R. Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery – Is it justified? J Laryngol Otol. 1993; 107(10): 902-5
Akita S, Akino K, Imaizumi T, Tanaka K, Anraku K, Yano H, Hirano A. A polyurethane dressing is beneficial for split thickness skin graft donor wound healing. Burns 2006; 32(4): 447-51
Handel N, Gutierrez J. Long term safety and efficacy of polyurethane foam-covered breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2006; 26(3): 265-74
Wheatley DJ, Raco L, Bernacca GM, Sim I, Belcher PR, Boyd JS. Polyurethane: material for the next generation of heart valve prostheses? European J Cardio thoracic Surg. 2000; 17: 440-8
Hesham A, Ghali A. Rapidrhino versus merocel nasal packs in septal surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2011; 125(12): 1244-6
Yilmaz MS, Guven M, Elicora SS, Kaymaz R. An evaluation of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam in patients following septoplasty: A prospective randomized trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Sur. 2013; 148(1): 140-4.