All Cartilage No Stitch Type 1 Tympanoplasty – A Prospective Study

Main Article Content

Debdulal Chakraborty
Chiranjib Das
Pritam Chatterjee
Rajesh Hansda

Abstract

Introduction


Although temporalis fascia is the commonly used graft material for tympanoplasty, cartilage has become the material of choice in cases with eustachian tube dysfunction, bilateral disease, total or anterior perforation of tympanic membrane, tympanosclerosis etc. Cartilage slices < 0.5 mm thick are similar to the tympanic membrane in their acoustic properties. The present study is aimed to describe stitch-less type 1 tympanoplasty with sliced tragal cartilage-perichondrium and evaluate anatomical, audiological and cosmetic outcomes.


Materials and Methods


A prospective study was conducted from March 2014 to August 2016, in ENT department of a Government Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India. Primary tympanoplasty cases irrespective of age, size and site of perforation, laterality and eustachian tube function were included in the study. History of previous tympanoplasty or mastoid surgery and cases requiring ossicular reconstruction or mastoidectomy were excluded from the study. Sliced tragal cartilage-perichondrium graft of 0.2 mm thickness was placed in underlay fashion through trans-canal or end-aural route.


Results


Among 95 cases 38 were male, 57 were female with age range between 7 to 68 years. Average operative time was 30 minutes. Graft take was successful in 97.89% of cases. Average Air Bone Gap 12 months after operation was 13.03dB.


Conclusion


Sliced cartilage-perichondrium graft gives good balance between sufficient stability and adequate acoustic sensitivity. Moreover, no stitch technique reduces operative time and increases cosmesis.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Chakraborty D, Das C, Chatterjee P, Hansda R. All Cartilage No Stitch Type 1 Tympanoplasty – A Prospective Study. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2020Jul.28 [cited 2024Dec.25];26(3):183-9. Available from: https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/207
Section
Main article
Author Biography

Pritam Chatterjee

Senior resident, ENT, BSMCH, Bankura

References

Kazikdas KC, Onal K, Boyraz I, Karabulut E. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 264: 985-9

Indorewala S. Dimensional stability of free fascia grafts: clinical application. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 278-82

Zollner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955; 69: 657-9

Wullstein H. Funktionelle Operationen im Mittelohr mit Hilfe des Freien Spaltappentransplantates. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1952; 161: 422-35

Neumann A, Kevenhoerster K, Gostian AO. Long-term results of palisade cartilage tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2010; 31: 936-9

Onal K, Arslanoglu S, Oncel S, et al. Perichondrium/cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in Type I tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 40: 295-9

Zahnert T, Huttenbrink K-B, Murbe D, et al. Experimental investigations of the use of cartilage in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Am J Otol. 2000; 21: 322-8

Westerberg J, Harder H, Magnuson B, Westerberg L, Hydén D. Ten-year myringoplasty series: does the cause of perforation affect the success rate? J Laryngol Otol. 2011; 125: 126-32

Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SS. Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effec¬tive than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol. 2012; 33: 699-705

Lin YC, Wang WH, Weng HH, Lin YC. Predictors of surgical and hearing long-term results for inlay cartilage tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 137: 215-9

Gerber MJ, Mason JC, Lambert PR. Hearing results after primary cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 1994-96

Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997; 107: 1094-9

Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H. A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005; 30: 115-20

Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 139: 386-90

Yegin Yakup, Çelik Mustafa, Koç Arzu Karaman, Küfeciler Levent, Elbistanlı Mustafa Suphi, Kayhan Fatma Tülin. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties. Braz. J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 82: 695-701

Yung, M. Cartilage Tympanoplasty: Literature Review. J Laryngol Otol. 2008; 122, 663-72

Yurttas V, Yakut F, Kutluhan A, Bozdemir K. Preparation and placement of cartilage island graft in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 80: 522-6

Heermann J. Experiences with free transplantation of facia-connective tissue of the temporalis muscle in tympanoplasty and reduction of the size of the radical cavity. Cartilage bridge from the stapes to the lower border of the tympanic membrane. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol. 1962; 41: 141-55

Tos M. Cartilage tympanoplasty methods: proposal of a classification. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2008; 139: 747-58

Khan MM, Parab SR. Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results. Am J Otolaryngol. 2011; 32: 381-7

Sismanis A, Dodson K, Kyrodimos E. Cartilage ‘‘shield’’ grafts in revision tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2008; 29:330-3

Tek A, Karaman M, Uslu C. et al. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 269: 1117-26

Ghanem MA, Monroy A, Alizadeh FS, Nicolau Y, Eavey RD. (2006) Butterfly Cartilage Graft Inlay Tympanoplasty for Large Perforations. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 1813-6

Overbosch HC. Homograft myringoplasty with microsliced septal cartilage. Proc Otorhinolaryngol. 1971; 33: 356-7

Amedee RG, Mann WJ, Riechelmann H. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty. Am J Otol. 1989; 10: 447-50.

Gierek T, Slaska-Kaspera A, Majzel K, Klimczak-Gotqbm L. Results of myringoplasty and type I tympanoplasty with the use of fascia, cartilage and perichondrium grafts. Otolaryngologia Polska 2004; 3: 529-33

Couloigner V, Baculard F, El Bakkouri W, et al. Inlay butterfly cartilage tympanoplasty in children. Otol Neurotol. 2005; 26: 247Y51

Wu PW, Wang WH, Huang CC, Lee TJ, Huang CC. Comparison of Short- and Long-term Hearing Outcomes of Successful Inlay Cartilage Tympanoplasty Between Small and Large Eardrum Perforations. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 2015; 8: 359-63

Kalcioglu T, Firat Y, Selimoglu E. Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique: a comparison with the temporalis muscle fascia technique. Int Adv Otol. 2009; 5: 45-50

Chen XW, Yang H, Gao RZ, Yu R, Gao ZQ (2010). Perichondrium/cartilage composite graft for repairing large tympanic membrane perforations and hearing improvement. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123: 301-4.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>