A Study on Satisfaction Levels among Hearing Aid Users in Gangetic Plains
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction
Outcome assessments have emerged as an effective method for determining whether or not hearing aids are working to achieve positive results in rehabilitating the hearing impaired. Present study aims to assess the satisfaction level of clientele using hearing aids.
Material and Methods
One hundred and fourteen (114) hearing handicapped patients, fitted with government-provided hearing aids at various clinics spread over Gangetic plains were included in this prospective observational study for outcome analysis. Follow up was done at 2 weeks and 45 days when they were further motivated to continue using the aid, comfortable fitting of mould was ensured along with minor trouble shooting. Four and half months later, their satisfaction level was assessed by analysing their response to Clientele Satisfaction Questionnaire.
Results
Fifty percent of the patients were motivated by their family members to try the aid whereas 50% were self motivated. Better communication with family members and immediate social circle was the common motive. Majority (85%) reported high level of satisfaction in terms of hearing benefit. Patients with severe degree of hearing loss were more satisfied and used the aid for longer duration in a day. Handling the aid was not as much of a problem as tolerating the noise produced by aid itself. Cost of battery was a concern for 80% of our clientele.
Conclusion
Proper fitting of hearing aid improved the quality of life of majority of our hearing handicapped clientele by overcoming their psychosocial problems.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Gagné J. What is treatment evaluation research? What is its relationship to the goals of audiological rehabilitation? Who are the stakeholders of this type of research? Ear Hear 2000; 21(4):60S-73S
Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: the SADL scale. Ear Hear 1999; 20(4):306-20
Taylor B. Audiology Online Contributing Editor. Self‑Report Assessment of HA Outcome – An Overview; 2007
Magni C, Freiberger F, Tonn K. Evaluation of satisfaction measures of analog and digital HA users. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 71(5): 650-7
Şahin H, Akın SO, Aydın E. Effects of the Unilateral HA on Hearing and Quality of Life in Adult Patients. J Otolaryngol ENT Res. 2015; 3(3): 00065. DOI: 10.15406/joentr. 2015. 03.00065
Jerram JC, Purdy SC. Technology, expectations, and adjustment to hearing loss: predictors of HA outcome. J Am Acad Audiol. 2001; 12:64-79
Bhat N, Shewale SS, Kasat PD, Tawade HS. Survey on HA use and satisfaction in patients with presbyacusis. Indian J Otol. 2015; 21:124-8
Kochkin S, Marke Trak VIII. Patients report improved quality of life with HA usage. The Hearing Journal 2011; 64:25‑26, 28, 30, 32
Bertoli S, Staehelin K, Zemp E, Schindler C, Bodmer D, Probst R. Survey on HA use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol. 2009; 48:183‑95
Köjbler S, Rosenhall U, Hansson H. Bilateral HAs – Effects and consequences from a user perspective. ScandAudiol. 2001; 30:223‑35.