A Comparative Study on Endoscopic Underlay versus Interlay Technique of Type I Tympanoplasty

Main Article Content

Sajitha K B
Naveen Kumar A G

Abstract

Introduction: Tympanoplasty by underlay method is the commonly employed technique to repair perforated tympanic membrane and is conventionally done using a microscope. Aim of this study was to compare the results of underlay and interlay technique of endoscopic tympanoplasty between two groups.


Materials and methods:  A total of 100 patients were included in the study, with in a period of two years. All of them underwent type I endoscopic tympanoplasty, 50 patients in group 1 by interlay and 50 patients in group 2 by underlay method. All of whom were followed up for 6 months. Patients were evaluated and compared in terms of graft uptake, improvement in hearing and rate of complications


Results:  In the present study, Group 1 patients have recorded a graft uptake rate of 100% where as in group 2 it was 94%. 88% of the patients in group 1 and 84 % in group 2 reported a complete ABG closure at the end of 6 month.


Conclusion: Endoscopic tympanoplasty, by interlay technique gives a very good success rate both in terms of graft uptake and air-bone gap closure when compared to underlay method.


KEYWORDS: endoscopic tympanoplasty, interlay, underlay

Article Details

How to Cite
A Comparative Study on Endoscopic Underlay versus Interlay Technique of Type I Tympanoplasty. (2023). Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 31(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.47210/bjohns.2023.v31i1.848
Section
Main article
Author Biographies

Sajitha K B, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Hesarghatta main road, Chikkasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka

Assistant Professor, Department of ENT

Naveen Kumar A G, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Hesarghatta main road, Chikkasandra, Bangalore, Karnataka

Professor, Department of ENT

How to Cite

A Comparative Study on Endoscopic Underlay versus Interlay Technique of Type I Tympanoplasty. (2023). Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, 31(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.47210/bjohns.2023.v31i1.848

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>