Does Anterior Tunnelling Really Help in Underlay Type I Tympanoplasty?

Main Article Content

Sohag Kundu
Bhaskar Ghosh
Bijan Kumar Adhikary
Mainak Dutta

Abstract

Introduction


Stabilizing the graft can be difficult with the conventional method of underlay tympanoplasty when the tympanic membrane perforation is subtotal, large or anteriorly placed with thin anterior rim. Tympanoplasty with anterior tunnelling has been tried to overcome this problem.


Materials and Methods


A prospective study over two-year period was carried out with follow up for three months on 59 patients under two groups- the underlay tympanoplasty with anterior tunnelling and the conventional tympanoplasty with anterior tucking for comparison in terms of pre-and post-operative anatomical correction and physiological improvements


Results


Follow up at 6 weeks and 12 weeks post operatively gives statistically comparable graft take up, hearing result and residual perforations.


Discussion


Among various techniques of dealing with these types of perforations, statistical comparability of the two groups brings in an acceptability to this simple but satisfying procedure of the underlay tympanoplasty with anterior tunnelling.


Conclusion


Underlay tympanoplasty technique (type-I) for subtotal, large or anteriorly placed perforations with thin anterior rim, can be managed by combining with anterior tunnelling which provides at least comparable results (if not more security against graft medialization) in respect of anatomical closure of perforations and hearing outcomes.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Kundu S, Ghosh B, Adhikary BK, Dutta M. Does Anterior Tunnelling Really Help in Underlay Type I Tympanoplasty?. BJOHNS [Internet]. 2017Dec.29 [cited 2024Dec.22];25(3):142-7. Available from: https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/135
Section
Main article
Author Biographies

Sohag Kundu, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal

RMO cum Clinical Tutor

Department of ENT

Bhaskar Ghosh, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal

Assistant professor

Department of ENT

Bijan Kumar Adhikary, Medical College, Kolkata

RMO cum Clinical Tutor

Department of ENT

Mainak Dutta, Medical College, Kolkata

RMO cum Clinical Tutor

Department of ENT

References

Athanasiadis-Sismanis A. Tympanoplasty: tympanic membrane repair, p475-477 in: Gulya AJ, Minor LB, Poe D. Glasscock-Shambaugh Surgery of the Ear (6th Edition). Shelton, Ct.: People's Medical Publishing House-USA; 2010

Saha AK, Munsi DM, Ghosh SN. Evaluation of improvement of hearing in type I tympanoplasty & its influencing factors. IJLO. 2006;58(3):253-257

Vadiya SI, Shah SK, Chaudhary M. Comparison of canal wall incisions for tympanoplasty for large central perforations. Indian J Otol. 2015; 21:186-9

Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ, Shelton C. Reconstruction of the middle ear, p240 in: Ed Snow JB, Wackym PA. Ballenger's Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (17th Edition). Shelton: PMPH USA, Ltd.; 2014

Kartush JM, Michaelides EM, Becvarovski Z, LaRouere MJ. Over under tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 2002; 112:802-7

Poe SD. Perforations of the tympanic membrane, p168, 170f in: Ed Nadol JB, McKenna MJ. Surgery of the Ear and Temporal Bone (2nd edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004

F. Fiorino, F Barbieri. ‘Over-underlay’ myringoplasty with umbo-anchor graft. J Laryngol Otol. 2008:122(8); 854-7

Mokhtarinejad F, Okhovat SA, Barzegar F. Surgical and hearing results of the circumferential sub annular grafting technique in tympanoplasty: A randomized clinical study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2012; 33:75-9

Lee HY, Auo HJ, Kang JM. Loop overlay tympanoplasty for anterior or subtotal perforations. Auris Nasus Larynx 2010; 37:162-6

Ganguly SN et al. Underlay tympanoplasty with tunnelling and placement of graft in anterior canal wall. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal 2011;7(4):44-47

Gupta S, Kalsotra P. Hearing gain in different types of tympanoplasties. Indian J Otol. 2013(19) Issue 4:186-193.

Most read articles by the same author(s)